


IAFS 4500/The Post-Cold War World
Fall 2011
Instructor: Dr. Gregory D. Young
Office: Ketchum
Hall, Room 4A
Office Phone: (303) 492-4265
E-mail: gyoung@colorado.edu
Lecture
Times:
Tuesdays and Thursdays 12:30-1:45pm in Hellums Hall
263
Syllabus: http://socsci.colorado.edu/~gyoung/home/4500/4500_syl.htm
Office Hours: Tuesdays & Thursdays 11:00-12:30 or by
appointment
COURSE LINKS
· Weekly Thought
Paper Questions
· Schedule
for Current Event Presentations
· Schedule and
Links to Course Reading Summaries
· Link to Potential
Midterm Questions
· Midterm
Grading Statistical Summary
·
Link to Take-Home Final Exam Question
Course Objectives
Almost twenty years have passed since the end of the Cold War, but we are still struggling to understand the nature of the world that has emerged in its wake. What are now the main sources of conflict in the “new world order”, now that the fifty-year bipolar standoff between the U.S. and the USSR has dissolved? Is terrorism of the kind exhibited on 9/11 the biggest threat to global security or is there a new, more sinister threat from weapons of mass destruction? This course is going to focus on the weapons of mass destruction that defined the “balance of terror during the Cold War. Clearly before one can understand the most important global issues confronting the post-Cold War World, one must understand the Cold War. Therefore, the first part of the course will confront the origins of, dynamics during, and reasons for the end of the Soviet/U.S. balance of terror. The latter part will examine the role of WMD in the Post-Cold War world. The end result will be a paper/take-home final exam that attempts to define what exactly what the new world order is and what should be the new paradigm for global interaction.
Course Requirements
Required
Reading
There
are no textbooks to purchase for this class. All
course readings (and a World Atlas) delineated in the course schedule are
available at the following online site to which all students will subscribe: http://www.americaandtheworld.com. This site (AATW) provides both distribution and reference
for this course, but also copyright payment for the articles you will read. Access
to this website will be purchased for $45.00. Access will be explained in
detail in class. The readings for this course are interdisciplinary, including
works from political science, history, economics and geography. All of the
readings are required Other readings will be
linked to this syllabus.

READINGS
It is essential that students attend every
class and be on time. Regular attendance
and active participation in any class discussion will enhance your
understanding of the course material and almost certainly improve your performance
on the midterm exam, weekly papers and on your final paper, which are together
worth 80% of the course grade. Attendance is also a large portion of your 10%
participation grade. More than five unexcused absences will result in a failing
grade in the course. Notifying your
instructor by email prior to class will constitute an excused absence. Send
email absence notifications to gyoung@colorado.edu. In this semester, the required readings
range from 100 to 150 pages per week, as set out in the course schedule.
Students should come to class having already completed (and thought carefully
about) the assigned reading for each class period.
MIDTERM
EXAM
The midterm exam will be
held during normal class time on Tuesday, October 18th . The
exam will consist of several terms and two essay questions. Students will write
the exam in a BlueBook provided to the instructor at
least one day in advance of the exam. The final exam will be a take-home essay
due in the professor’s box by 4:30pm on the final exam day (Tuesday,
December 13th). The question(s) for the final will be posted on the last
class day. The final exam will also be graded on appropriated grammar,
punctuation and spelling. The final exam grade will be reduced by 10% for every
day that it is turned in late. The two exams are worth 50% of your final course
grade.
WEEKLY
THOUGHT PAPERS
At
the end of lecture each Thursday, a thought question will be posed to the class
and posted on the course web site. The question will relate to either the topic
in that week’s lectures. Students will write a two-page, single-spaced
(Approximately 900-1000 words) response to the question to turn in the
following Thursday in class. Please
include a word count on the first page. These papers should be properly
documented and footnoted using the course readings. Papers will be graded 50%
on content and 50% on grammar, punctuation and spelling. Late Papers will not
be accepted unless prior arrangements have been made. On a random basis, electronic
copies of these papers will be checked for plagiarism. There will be thirteen
questions posted. Each student must
answer at least six of them. Students completing fewer than six will have
zeros averaged in with their grades on the completed papers. Those students
completing more than six will only have six best grades included. These thought
papers account for 30% of your final course grade.
READING SUMMARY
For
each section of the reading, an assigned student(s) will summarize the readings
due in class that day. In a 3-4 page synopsis of each assigned set of articles
or chapters, the designated student will give an overview of the key points of
the reading. The summary can either be in outline form or complete paragraphs.
The summary should include an answer to the “so what?” question, in other
words, why should one read it when studying about war and peace. On the due
date, before the start of class, the students will submit both a paper copy and
an electronic copy to their instructor. The instructor will post the summary on
the web for the review of your classmates. These summaries will be 10% of your
final grade and graded pass/fail. Late Reading Summaries will be docked 10% per
class day up to 50%.
CURRENT EVENTS
Students should also follow contemporary world events by
reading a reputable international news source, such as the New York Times on a regular basis. One
to two students will present a current event orally in class each day. The
presentation should be no more than five minutes in length. The source should
be from a respected news source, be less than one week old and pertain in some
way to global issue being discussed that week in the seminar. Each student
should try to relate the article to some element of what we will be discussing
in class. News reports on the Internet are acceptable sources. The current
event presentation will be part of your 10% participation grade.
grading Criteria
Weekly Thought Papers (Best 7) 30%
Midterm Exam 25%
Take-Home Final Exam/Paper 25%
Reading Summaries 10%
Attendance, Current Event & participation 10%
Total 100%
Final Course Grades will be curved unless a straight
90/80/70/60 etc… proves more beneficial to the students (higher overall grade
average). If curved, the mean overall average will become the highest C+ grade,
and two standard deviations below the mean will be necessary to fail the
course. One standard deviation about the mean becomes the criteria for an A
grade. The grading policy will be explained in detail on the first day of
class.
Fall 2011 Course Schedule
|
Day/Date |
Topic/Event |
Assigned Reading
Due |
|
Tuesday 23 Aug |
Course Intro & Administration |
None |
|
Thursday 25 Aug |
The End of the Cold War and New Paradigms for Global Interaction (Part I) |
· Samuel Huntington “Clash of Civilizations”
Foreign Affairs · Francis Fukuyama “The End of History” · Benjamin Barber “Jihad v. McWorld” · Robert Kaplan “The Coming Anarchy” The
Atlantic Monthly, · Joseph S. Nye “A New World Order” in Nye
(Ed). Understanding International
Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, 1997 |
|
Tuesday 30 Aug |
History of the Cold War: Origins of the Cold War History of the Cold War Movie: “War & Peace in the Nuclear Age – Dawn” |
· David Painter(1999), Chapter 2 in The Cold War: An International History. |
|
Thursday 1 Sep |
History of the Cold War: MacCarthyism and “Thinking the Unthinkable” |
· David Painter(1999),
Chapter 3 in The Cold War: An
International History. |
|
Tuesday 6 Sep |
History of the Cold War Arms Control |
· David Painter(1999), Chapter 4 in The Cold War: An International History.
|
|
Thursday 8 Sep |
History of the Cold War U.S. Cold War Defense Policy Thought Paper 1 Due |
· Richard Smoke, (1993), Chapter 4, “America fashions
its national security”, in National
Security and the Nuclear Dilemma. |
|
Tuesday 13 Sep |
History of the Cold War Détente |
· David Painter(1999), Chapter 5 in The Cold War: An International History. |
|
Thursday 15 Sep |
History of the Cold War Nuclear Weapons & the Nuclear Arsenals Thought Paper 2 Due |
· William Arkin
&Richard Fieldhouse Chapter 3 “Nuclear Arsenals” in Nuclear Battlefields |
|
Tuesday 20 Sep |
History of the Cold War: The End of the Cold War |
· David Painter(1999), Chapter 6 in The Cold War: An International History |
|
Thursday 22 Sep |
Nuclear War Movie: “Dr. Strangelove” (Excerpts Thought Paper 3 Due |
None |
|
Tuesday 27 Sep |
Nuclear War Thinking the Unthinkable |
· Herman Kahn (1984), “Thinking about the
unthinkable” Part One in Thinking About
The Unthinkable in the 1980s, · Henry Kissinger (1957) “The Fires of
Prometheus” in Nuclear Weapons and
Foreign Policy |
|
Thursday 29 Sep |
Nuclear War How it might begin Thought Paper 4 Due |
· Harvard Nuclear Study Group “How Might Nuclear
War Begin” in The Nuclear Reader |
|
Tuesday 4 Oct |
Nuclear War Nuclear Winter |
· Carl Sagan (1989), “Nuclear War and
Climatic Catastrophe: A Nuclear Winter.” In The Nuclear Reader. · Starley Thompson & Stephen Schneider (1989), “Nuclear
Winter Reappraised” In The Nuclear
Reader. |
|
Thursday 6 Oct |
Nuclear War By Accident Thought Paper 5 Due |
· Bruce G. Blair (1993), Introduction to The Logic of Accidental Nuclear War |
|
Tuesday 11 Oct |
Strategy for Nuclear War |
· Theodore Draper “Nuclear Temptations:
Doctrinal Issues in the Strategic Debate.” In The Nuclear Reader · William Martel & Paul Savage, “Nuclear
Strategy: What it is and Is Not” in The
Nuclear Reader · Robert Jervis, “The Utility of Nuclear
Deterrence” in The Use of Force |
|
Thursday 13 Oct |
Strategy for Nuclear War Thought Paper 6 Due |
· National conference of Catholic Bishops,
“Nuclear Strategy and the Challenge of Peace: The Moral Evaluation of
Deterrence in Light of Policy Developments” in The Nuclear Reader |
|
Tuesday 18 Oct |
Midterm Examination |
Study Study Study |
|
Thursday 20 Oct |
Nuclear Proliferation The NNPT Movie: “War & Peace in the Nuclear Age – Have and Have Not” Thought Paper 7 Due |
· Ian Smart (1989), “Pinioning the Genie: International Checks on the Spread of Nuclear
Weapons” In The Nuclear Reader. |
|
Tuesday 25 Oct |
Nuclear Proliferation Which is better more or less? In Class Debate |
· Scott Sagan & Kenneth Waltz (2003), Chapter 1 & 2 in The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed |
|
Thursday 27 Oct |
Nuclear Proliferation India & Pakistan Thought Paper 8 Due |
· Jaswant Singh (1998), “Against Nuclear Apartheid” Foreign Affairs · Kenneth Waltz, “Nuclear Stability in South
Asia” in The Use of Force · Scott Sagan, “Nuclear Instability in South
Asia” in The Use of Force |
|
Tuesday 1 Nov |
Nuclear Proliferation Iran Go Over Midterm Exam |
· Ehsaneh I. Sadr, “The Impact of Iran’s Nuclearization on Israel” in The Use of Force |
|
Thursday 3 Nov |
Nuclear Proliferation North Korea Thought Paper 9 Due |
·
Broad, “Hidden Travels of the
Bomb”, New York Times, Tues 9 Dec
08 · Robert Kaplan “When North Korea Falls |
|
Tuesday 8 Nov |
Chemical & Biological Weapons |
· Gregory Koblentz,
“Pathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological
Weapons” in The Use of Force. · Jean Pascal Zanders, (1999) “ Assessing the
Risk of Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation to Terrorists” in The Nonproliferation Review. |
|
Thursday 10 Nov |
Military Utility of WMD Thought Paper 10 Due |
· Robert McNamara (1989), The Military Role
of Nuclear Weapons: Perceptions and Misperceptions.” In The Nuclear Reader. · Kanti Bajpai (2001),
“The Military Utility of Nuclear Weapons” Pugwash
Conference |
|
Tuesday 15 Nov |
Defensive Systems ABM & Star Wars |
· Robert Bowman, “The objectives of ballistic
missile defense.” In The Nuclear Reader. · Robert McNamara “The Star Wars Defense
System: A Technical Note” in The
Nuclear Reader |
|
Thursday 17 Nov |
Defensive Systems (cont.) Movie: “War and Peace in the Nuclear Age - Reagan’s Shield” Thought Paper 11 Due |
|
|
Tue/Thu 22-24 Nov |
Fall Break |
None |
|
Tuesday 29 Nov |
WMD in Terrorist Hands “The Sum of all Fears” |
· Graham Allison (2004), Part One
“Inevitable” in Nuclear Terrorism: The
Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe · Walter
Laquer (1999), Weapons of Mass Destruction in The New Terrorism. |
|
Thursday 1 Dec |
The Future of WMD/ Nuclear Weapons Thought Paper 12 Due |
· Thomas Schelling (2009), “A World without
Nuclear Weapons”, Daedalus · Wall
St. Journal “A World Free
of Nuclear Weapons” January 4, 2007 · John Mueller (1988), “The Essential
Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World.” International Security. · McGeorge Bundy “The Unimpressive Record of Atomic
Diplomacy” in The Use of Force,
(2009) |
|
Tuesday 6 Dec |
Obama and Strategic Weapons NEW START Video: President Obama’s speech on nuclear weapons in Prague 2010 Movie: Dawn of the Nuclear Age – Visions of War and Peace |
· Mary Beth Sheridan, “The nuclear arms policy shoes limits U.S. faces? The Washington Post, April 7, 2010 · C.
Dale Walton and Colin S. Gray (2007). “The Second Nuclear Age: Nuclear
Weapons in the Twenty-First Century” in Strategy
in the Contemporary World |
|
Thursday 8 Dec |
Make Up Day and Review for Final Exam Thought Paper 13 Due |
|
|
Tuesday 13 Dec |
Take-home Final Exam due |
Study, Study, Study |
ADMINISTRATIVE
INFORMATION:
CELLULAR TELEPHONE/LAPTOP COMPUTER POLICY
Needless to say, all cellular phones must
be turned off and put away at the beginning of each class meeting. Classes
failing to comply will be issued a stern warning on the first occasion. The
entire class will have a pop quiz over the previous reading
assignments/lectures on the second and subsequent occurrences. Phones, PDAs,
MP3 players and Blackberrys will not be out on desks
or used during any quiz or examination. Laptop computers will be allowed in
class, I still believe that they can assist learning in the classroom. However,
if abuse of the privilege appears to be a distraction in class, then they will
be banned.
Students With Disabilities
If you qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please submit to me a letter from Disability Services in a timely manner so that your needs be addressed. Disability Services determines accommodations based on documented disabilities. Contact: 303-492-8671, Willard 322, and www.Colorado.EDU/disabilityservices Disability Services' letters for students with disabilities indicate legally mandated reasonable accommodations. The syllabus statements and answers to Frequently Asked Questions can be found at www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices
Cheating
Cheating (using unauthorized materials or giving unauthorized assistance during an examination or other academic exercise) and plagiarism (using another's ideas or words without acknowledgment) are serious offenses in a university, and may result in a failing grade for a particular assignment, a failing grade for the course, and/or suspension for various lengths of time or permanent expulsion from the university. All students of the University of Colorado at Boulder are responsible for knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy of this institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating, plagiarism, aid of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery, and threatening behavior. All incidents of academic misconduct shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu; 303-725-2273). Students who are found to be in violation of the academic integrity policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to university probation, suspension, or expulsion). Other information on the Honor Code can be found at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/honor.html and at http://www.colorado.edu/academics/honorcode/
The development of the
Internet has provided students with historically unparalleled opportunities for
conducting research swiftly and comprehensively. The availability of these
materials does not, however, release the student from appropriately citing
sources where appropriate; or applying standard rules associated with avoiding
plagiarism. Specifically, the instructor will be expecting to review papers
written by students drawing ideas and information from various sources (cited
appropriately), presented generally in the student’s words after careful
analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. An assembly of huge blocks of other
individuals' existing material, even when cited, does not constitute an
appropriate representation of this expectation. Uncited,
plagiarized material shall be treated as academically dishonest, and the paper
will be assigned an ‘F’ as a result.
Papers submitted by any student, written in part or in whole by someone
other than that student, shall be considered to constitute fraud under the
University Honor Code, and result in the assignment of an 'F' for the entire
course. If the student is confused as to what constitutes plagiarism, he/she
should review the CU Honor Code on this topic. If you have any questions
regarding proper documentation in your writing, please discuss it with your
instructor.
RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCES
The university has received valid complaints from students regarding the lack of adequate faculty accommodation for some students who have serious religious obligations, which may conflict with academic requirements such as scheduled exams. Campus policy regarding religious observances requires that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with all students who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with scheduled exams, assignments or required attendance. In this class, any notification of absence by email constitutes and excused absence. See full details at: http://www.colorado.edu/policies/fac_relig.html
A comprehensive calendar of the religious holidays most commonly observed by CU-Boulder students is at http://www.interfaithcalendar.org/
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
The University of Colorado Policy on Sexual Harassment applies to all students, staff and faculty. Sexual harassment is unwelcome sexual attention. It can involve intimidation, threats, coercion, or promises or create an environment that is hostile or offensive. Harassment may occur between members of the same or opposite gender and between any combination of members in the campus community: students, faculty, staff, and administrators. Harassment can occur anywhere on campus, including the classroom, the workplace, or a residence hall. Any student, staff or faculty member who believes s/he has been sexually harassed should contact the Office of Sexual Harassment (OSH) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of Judicial Affairs at 303-492-5550. Information about the OSH and the campus resources available to assist individuals who believe they have been sexually harassed can be obtained at http://www.colorado.edu/odh/
BASIC COURTESY TO YOUR CLASSMATE AND YOUR
INSTRUCTORS
Please
arrive on time and do not leave early.
If you absolutely must leave early, please let me know at the beginning
of class and sit near a door so you do not cause too much disruption.
Similarly, if arriving late, please take a seat as quickly and quietly as
possible. Take care of all your
business before class begins; do not leave and return during class as this
creates a disturbance to others.
Taking this course signifies acceptance of the terms and conditions stated in this syllabus.